Overall Research Directions:

My doctoral research explores modular theory, focusing on the complex interactions and paradoxes associated with modularity in knowledge management contexts. My work primarily addresses how modular systems influence knowledge retention, fragmentation, and rediscovery, particularly within industries undergoing significant technological shifts. Additionally, I investigate the strategic vulnerabilities inherent in modular systems using metaphors from historical and strategic contexts to find the strategies to navigate this inherent issue. Currently, I have formed two topics related to the study of modular theory in knowledge management:


Topic 1: Leveraging Modular System for Knowledge Retention and Rediscovery in the Urban Design & Construction Industry

This topic addresses the nuanced relationship between modular systems and knowledge dynamics within the urban design and construction industry. Modular designs offer substantial benefits such as enhanced efficiency, flexibility, and scalability. Yet, these systems also create barriers that can hide or fragment essential tacit knowledge. My research seeks to:

  • Investigate how modularity affects knowledge retention and rediscovery, especially in rapidly changing regulatory and technological environments.
  • Identify factors influencing the preservation or loss of knowledge within modular structures such as urban design.
  • Compare modular techniques to traditional construction methods concerning the longevity and survival of knowledge.

My interest in this topic stems from my background in architecture, where I witnessed firsthand the implications of modular approaches on knowledge management and innovation.

Topic 2:  Understanding 连环计 (Chain Stratagem) and the Dark Side of Modularity: How to unchain?

This research explores strategic vulnerabilities embedded within modular systems by using the metaphor of the Chain Stratagem (连环计), historically exemplified by interconnected systems that create stability yet conceal potential catastrophic weaknesses. Examples from history and business, such as the Battle of Red Cliffs, Pearl Harbor, and the Boeing 737 MAX crisis, illustrate how modular interdependencies can lead to systemic collapse.

My investigation aims to:

  • Examine the vulnerabilities introduced by excessive modular interdependencies.
  • Explore counter-strategies, including strategic decoupling, controlled redundancy, dynamic adaptability, and knowledge transparency, to mitigate these risks.
  • Apply insights from historical and strategic cases to inform modular versus monolithic design decisions, particularly in AI-driven logistics.

This topic interests me due to the paradoxical nature of modularity—its ability to simultaneously strengthen and weaken systems—which aligns closely with my broader fascination with organizational strategy and innovation.